10-07-05 Intense russische Interesse an Korruption der US-Gerichten und Banken Verordnung

Los Angeles, July 5 – Human Rights Alert (NGO) reported today intense Russian interest in online archives of records providing evidence of widespread corruption of the US courts and banking regulation. Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration in integrity of the justice system.
The archive site - in pro per.com - [1] is probably the least user's friendly of the Human Rights Alert sites. It holds thousands of records documenting corruption of the courts and banking regulation in the United States. The records are organized more or less by subject and by date, with barely informative titles.
However, visitors’ statistics [2] show thousands of visitors per month worldwide. The archive also attracts high level of indexing and crawling, although no promotion services were ever engaged to attract such indexing for any of the Human Rights Alert sites.
Of particular interest are hits from the Russian Federation and from China: Hits from the Russian Federation in the year 2010 by far exceeded hits from the United States itself. Page views from the Russian Federation exceed those from the US four-fold. Downloads from the Russian Federation are over two-fold higher than downloads from the US. China, which restricts internet access, apparently permits access to this site. China is a major stakeholder in the US banking system, and the primary victim of the dysfunctional US banking regulation.
In April 2010 Human Rights Alert filed report for the first ever review by the United Nations of Human Rights in the United States, scheduled for November 2010. The report documented widespread corruption of the courts in Los Angeles County, California, and refusal US agencies and senior US officers to address the problem. The report listed large-scale false imprisonments and financial fraud under the guise of court actions as the hallmarks of corruption at the courts.
LINKS:
[1] Archive
http://inproperinla.com/
[2] Full visitors stats by country for 2009
http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/2010/07/10-07-05-visitors-stats-for-archive.html

4. Juli 2010 betreffend Beschwerde auf False Inhaftierung von Richard Fine - wirft die öffentliche Korruption von California Chief Justice Ronald George

July 4th, 2010 Complaint pertaining to False Imprisonment of Richard Fine - Alleges Public Corruption by California Chief Justice Ronald George

Complaint Filed with US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, Alleging Public Corruption and Deprivation of Civil Rights Under the Color of Law by California Judicial Council, Chaired by California Chief Justice Ronald George.Los Angeles, July 4 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, filed complaint [1] with the newly re-established public corruption and civil rights unit of the US Attorney Office, alleging public corruption and deprivation of civil rights by the California Judicial Council, chaired by California Chief Justice Ronald George, pertaining to their conduct in the habeas corpus petition of Richard Fine.  Richard Fine, 70 year old, former US prosecutor, exposed, publicized, and rebuked the taking by judges in Los Angeles County of "not permitted" payments (called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.
On March 20, 2009, Richard Fine filed a habeas corpus petition Fine v Sheriff (2:09-cv-01914) at the US Court, Los Angeles.  The Sheriff, named Respondent, refused to answer on the petition.  Instead, the complaint alleged that the California Judicial Council falsely retained Attorney Kevin McCormick to answer on the petition on behalf of Judge David Yaffe and the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. The complaint provided documentation that the California Judicial Council retained Attorney McCormick under false case caption. Consequently, Attorney McCormick appeared with no authority at all, and with no communications with his purported clients either.  In such appearances, Attorney McCormick filed false and deliberately misleading records, purported as Judgment for the confinement of Mr Fine, and false declarations under penalty of perjury. The complaint further alleged that the parties involved - the Chief Justice Ronald George, the California Judicial Council, Attorney McCormick, Judge David Yaffe, and the California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles, were all duly informed of the wrongdoing, but none initiated any corrective actions, as required by law.  Therefore, the complaint stated that in fact, there were no valid records, conforming with the fundamentals of the law to provide the foundation of the arrest and imprisonment of Richard Fine.  Conduct of subjects of the complaint was alleged as false arrest and false imprisonment under the color of law, and retaliation against Richard Fine for exposing widespread corruption of judges in Los Angeles County, California.
In the complaint, copied to the US Senate Judiciary Committee, and filed to coincide with July 4th, the US Independence Day, the US Attorney, Central District of California, was asked to provide equal protection for Richard Fine and all 10 millions who reside in Los Angeles County California.
The complaint was also copied to the United Nations.  In report filed in April 2010 with the United Nations, Human Rights Alert (NGO) alleged widespread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County California, and large-scale false imprisonments, which the US government is refusing to address.  The report was filed as part of the first ever review of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations, scheduled for November 2010.  Human Rights Alert (NGO) recently initiated international lobbying to affect effective report by the United Nations regarding Human Rights in the United States.
LINKS:[1] July 4th, 2010 Complaint filed with US Attorney, Los Angeles, alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights by California Judicial Council, Chief Justice Ronald George, and others, relative to the imprisonment of Richard Fine.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33879469/
  

10-07-04 Menchengrechte - Human Rights - Unmittelbare Betroffenheit über die Universelle Menschliche Gemeinschaft

Human Rights - Direct Concern of the Universal Human Community

 Perhaps there is a need to reiterate the basic principle spearheaded by Eleanor Roosevelt, then US Ambassador to the United Nations: The Human Rights conditions of the people of any nation are not the private domain of the government of that nation. Instead, it is the direct concern of the universal human community.  Therefore, the proposal, again copied below, suggested that Human Rights organizations in the US define a short list of focused goals, and do their best to present such goals to the international community.

Moreover,  based on other nations' submissions to the November 2010 review of Human Rights in the  US, that issues that would likely feature most prominently in the November 2010 report by the United Nations are none of those which were highlighted in the proposal, copied below. 

Instead - the United Nations Human Rights Council report would most likely focus on the criminal justice system in the United States:

• Unreasonable number of those imprisoned - the US holds 5% of world population, while holding 25% of world's prisoners, 
• Conditions in the prisons - California prisons led to the appointment of a Human Rights Overseer even by the US Courts. 
• Use of the death penalty, and its excesses,
• The treatment of minorities by the US criminal justice system.

In short - Human Rights Alert (NGO) again calls upon US Human Rights stakeholders to join in, define a short list of focused lobbying themes, and likewise - define the best nations, organizations, and individuals to target in such lobbying.
It is a historic first -
The November 2010 Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States by the Human Rights Council of the United Nations.

10-07-04 Ein Aktionsplan

The Road Ahead 

Not only us, United States citizens and residents, suffer the consequences.  The evidence shows the key role of the US judiciary in undermining honest banking regulation in the US - key cause of the current crisis, which inflicted harm on workers and investors world wide.

Therefore, the international community must be seen as a stakeholder in conditions of the US justice system.  Disintegration of US government frameworks poses risks to world peace and welfare that cannot even be assessed.

This year, 2010, the United Nations is scheduled to perform a historic first - review (UPR) of Human Rights in the United States, and conditions of the US justice system are going to be central to the review.  Therefore, our main efforts should be focused on increasing international awareness of the crisis in the US justice system.

Zena,through OAK, filed and important report with the UN in that regard - focusing on intimidation of attorneys who represent individuals in efforts to protect rights - that was before the latest US Supreme Court ruling affirming that such representation could absurdly be deemed criminal conduct.  Human Rights Alert filed a report that focused on the alleged large-scale fraud in the US Courts computerized case management system. The claims are now up for review by international professionals.
I am not sure if whistle blower organizations filed a UPR report on the fate of whistle blowers in the United States, but that is a central feature of the corruption of the courts as well - whistle blowers end up in prison and/or are driven to seek refuse outside the United States.A. JULY-NOVEMBER 2010: LOBBYING NATIONS IN RE - NOVEMBER 2010 REVIEW OF THE US BY THE UN The focus of our efforts should be on lobbying the nations that sit on the Human Rights Council and will conduct review of the United States justice system in November 2010, as part of the UPR (Universal Periodic Review).
The Urban Justice Center complied a list of nations,which had already raised questions regarding Human Rights conditions in the US pertaining to specific issues (e.g. - women's, minorities' rights, death penalty, etc) as part of the 2010 US UPR:
1. Algeria
2. Bolivia
3. Brazil
4. Canada
5. Chile
6. Czech Republic
7. Denmark
8. Egypt
9. Germany
10. Italy
11. Mexico
12. Netherlands
13. Philippines
14. Slovenia
15. Sweden
16. United Kingdom

In effort to focus lobbying efforts, Human Rights Alert extracted f rom the list produced by the Urban Justice Center, copied above, the following nations, as those, whose opinions the US government would not be able to easily dismiss: 1. Canada
2. Czech Republic
3. Denmark
4. Germany
5. Mexico
6. Netherlands
7. Sweden
8. United Kingdom

In addition, Human Rights Alert recommended that the following nations should be added to such list: 1. France - as a major EU nation
2. China - a major stakeholder in integrity, or lack thereof in the US banking system.
3. Venezuela - Government Ombudsman Gabriela del Mar Ramirez Perez is the current Secretary of the Network of the NHRIs of the Americas.

Efforts should be made to communicate with Human Rights organizations of these nations, and gain their support in lobbying their governments. Likewise, efforts should be made to identify persons of authority and influence among these nations, who are sympathetic to the cause of Human Rights.It is a historic opportunity - the first ever international review of the US justice system. The time is short - from now to November 2010.  We must focus on such efforts.  The airline employees and retirees may be uniquely positioned to help in such efforts, through their knowledge of languages, countries, and people.B. NOVEMBER 2010: PROPOSED KEY DEFICIENCIES TO BE INCLUDED IN THE UN UPR REPORT ON THE US Let's focus on defining the key deficiencies in the US justice system that we all agree should be listed in the report.  The following three key issued are proposed for discussion:
1) Due Process in review, and prosecution - if necessary, of the people's complaints of judicial and public corruption, including, but not limited to effective whistle blower protection
2) Public review of integrity of the computers of the courts and prisons in the United States.
3) An end to the intimidation and persecution of attorneys who represent individuals in protecting Constitutional, Civil, and Human Rights.C. NOVEMBER 2010: PROPOSED MILESTONES FOR THE UN UPR REPORT ON THE UNITED STATES: Furthermore, we should proposed concrete, easily monitored milestones, which the United Nations should ask the United States to achieve between 2010 and the next review - in 2014, on each of these matters.
For example: Proposed milestones in re: Key Deficiencies in integrity of computers of the justice system:
2) (a) May 2011: Establishment of a public process, for acceptance and review of peoples complaints on the matter.
2) (b) November 2011: Report including recommendations for review procedures of existing systems, and procedures to be applied to any new systems prior to implementation.
2) (c) May 2012: Initiation of review of existing systems through well defined, publicly and legally accountable procedures.
2) (d) November 2012: Establishment by law and/or regulations procedures pertaining to review of new systems prior to implementation.
2) (e) May 2012: Report and recommendations from process initiated in 2(c), above.
2) (f) May 2013:        Implementation of recommendations based on report from 2(e), above.     
  D. 2010-2014: MONITORING BY US AND INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS GROUPS OF US PROGRESS After November 2010, and in anticipation of the 2014 UPR, we should all unite in lobbying US agencies to honestly work to achieve the milestones, and in monitoring actual progress of the United States in achieving such milestones.

Your input on these matters would be greatly appreciated.

Truly, 
Joseph Zernik, PhD Human Rights Alert (HRA), NGOhttp://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
LINKS:
[1] The Road Aheadhttp://www.scribd.com/doc/31433805/

10-07-03 Die Psychiater fragt: Was ist falsch an Obama? Human Rights Alert antworten: Der Richterrat-Banking Komplex ...

A Shrink Asks: What's Wrong with Obama? Human Rights Alert Answers: The Judicial-Banking Complex...

President Harding (1921-3)        President Coolige (1923-9)         President Hoover (1929-1933)
Dear Robin of Berkeley:
Let me offer you some unsolicited alternative psycho-political insights.  Although I have not researched Obama that deeply, I have read enough to realize that he spent his formative years moving from one part of the world to another, traversing cultures, which were not only vastly different, but also to a large degree hostile to each other.  To cope, he changed names and identities in an effort to reduce conflicts and dissonance, wherever he was at.  He used who knows how many social security numbers, and on that count alone he should be considered beyond 3 standard deviations from the mean.  No matter what, he always managed to land on his feet, find a helping hand, and thrive.  In short - he is a uniquely skilled, adaptable survivor, street smart, very bright, highly educated, but void of a clear core identity that can be easily pinned down. His inner-self is buried somewhere deep; it is not something that he would ever show the world, maybe not even to his family... He is not a politician who has clearly thought-out convictions on any particular matter either... It is whatever it would take to win the day.
Asked for his opinion about Obama's civil rights policy  - an area that you would expect the first ever self-identified Black-American president to hold dear to his heart - Dershowitz, who claims to have been an early supporter, and who knew Obama since his Harvard law school days, simply answered : He does not have any!
Moreover, being so adept at merging in, Obama is probably a perfect subject for scripting, and even what you considered his "inappropriate" "kick ass" comments were probably scripted, he was just the medium.  Moreover, he is uniquely talented in delivering the scripts, even if they shift aimlessly... you got to grant him that!
On the disconnect - I would not blame it on his personality.  It is the nature of the dwellers of the White House for some time now, in case you have not noticed... From Bush the first (encountering supermarket scanners with amazement), through Clinton, to Bush the second, and now Obama.  In this day and age, the US presidents lost control of the apparatus, and are deliberately isolated (remember Bush the second on September 11, or his "Mission Accomplished" declaration in the still ongoing Iraq war), manipulated by their Byzantine courts.
The center of power today rests with the Judicial-Banking Complex, by far mightier than Eisenhower's Military-Industrial Complex. (As a mental exercise, please compare either Roosevelt or Eisenhower with any of the presidents listed above).
To distill the current state of affairs, the balance among the three branches, and what it is really all about, please recall the Obama-Alito encounter during the State of the Union Address. It was the moment of clarity of his presidency... (as a mental exercise, please compare to Roosevelt's Packing the Supreme Court plan).
In short - you must reduce your expectation from the American presidency.  Let's hope that US Congress assert its power someday, and reign in the Judicial-Banking Complex, which landed us in the Robber Baron Revival Era and the Greater Depression.  Under conditions that prevailed last time around, the US produced presidents such as Herbert Clark Hoover, Warren G. Harding, and Calvin Coolidge. You can't expect any better in the foreseeable future.
Truly,

Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (HRA), NGOhttp://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
http://human-rights-alert.blogspot.com/
http://josephzernik.blog.co.uk/
http://menchenrechte-los-angeles.blogspot.com/
http://droitsdelhommealertelosangele.blogspot.com/
http://inproperinla.com/
.
A Shrink Asks: What's Wrong with Obama?
By Robin of BerkeleyA frequent AT contributor, Robin is a psychotherapist in Berkeley and a recovering liberal. You can e-mail Robin at robinofberkeley@hotmail.com. She regrets that she may not be able to acknowledge your e-mail.
So what is the matter with Obama? Conservatives have been asking this question for some time. I've written a number of articles trying to solve the mystery.
Even some liberals are starting to wonder. James Carville railed about Obama's blasé attitude after the catastrophic oil spill. The New York Times' Maureen Dowd revamped Obama's "Yes We Can" motto into "Will We Ever?"
The liberal women of the TV show "The View" have expressed sympathy for Michelle Obama's living with a man so out of touch. Peggy Noonan, hardly a vehement Obama foe, recently pronounced him disconnected.
Obama's odd mannerisms intrigue a psychotherapist like me. He also presents a serious diagnostic challenge.
For one, Obama's teleprompter and the men behind the Blackberry keep him well-scripted. We know so little about the facts of his life.
But it's more than just a lack of information. Obama himself is a strange bird. He doesn't fit easily into any diagnostic category.
Many people attribute Obama's oddness to his narcissism. True, Obama has a gargantuan ego, and he is notoriously thin-skinned.
Yet a personality disorder like narcissism does not explain Obama's strangeness: his giggling while being asked about the economy; his continuing a shout-out rather than announcing the Ft. Hood shootings; or his vacations, golfing, partying and fundraising during the calamitous oil spill.
Take also Obama's declaring on the "Today Show" that he wants to know whose ass to kick. Consummate narcissists would never stoop to this vulgar display of adolescent machismo.
Obama is flat when passion is needed; he's aggressive when savvy is required. What's most worrisome is that Obama doesn't even realize that his behavior is inappropriate.
So if it's not just simple narcissism, what is wrong with Obama? Since I've never evaluated him, I can't say for sure. But I can hazard some educated guesses.
If I saw a client as disconnected as him, the first thing I would wonder: Is something wrong with his brain? And I'd consider the following theoretical diagnostic possibilities.
--Physical problems: There are a multitude of physiological conditions that can cause people to act strangely. For instance: head injuries, endocrine disturbances, epilepsy, and toxic chemical exposure. It makes me wonder: Did Obama ever have a head injury? His stepfather in Indonesia was purportedly an alcoholic abuser. Was Obama subject to any physical abuse?
--Drugs and alcohol: Damage to the brain from drugs and alcohol can also cause significant cognitive impairments. Obama once said that there were 57 states -- and didn't correct himself. Memory problems can be caused by both illicit and prescription drug use. Obama admits to a history of drug use in his youth. Did his usage cause some damage? Does Obama still use?
--Asperger's Syndrome: Also known as high-functioning autism, Asperger's causes deficits in social skills. A person with Asperger's can't read social cues. Consequently, he can be insensitive and hurtful without even knowing it. Could Obama have Asperger's? He might have some mild traits, but certainly not the full-blown disorder. In contrast to Obama, those with Asperger's get fixated on some behavior, like programming computers. Obama lacks this kind of passion and zeal.
--Mental Illness: Obama's family tree is replete with the unbalanced. His maternal great-grandmother committed suicide. His grandfather, Stanley Dunham, was particularly unhinged: He was expelled from high school for punching his principal; named his daughter Stanley because he wanted a boy; and exposed young Barry to not just drunken trash talk, but unrestricted visits with alleged pedophile Frank Marshall Davis (who might or might not be Obama's biological father). Barack Sr. was an abusive, alcoholic bigamist. Since mental illness runs in the family, does Obama have any signs? Yes and no. No, he is not a schizophrenic babbling about Martians. But there are red flags for some other conditions. While Obama doesn't appear to hallucinate, he seems to have delusions. His believing he has a Messiah-like special gift smacks of grandiose delusions. His externalizing all blame to conservatives, George W. Bush, or the "racist" bogeyman hints at persecutory delusions.
Along with a delusional disorder, Obama may fit for a mild psychotic disorder called schizotypal disorder. It may explain some of Obama's oddness. People with schizotypal disorder hold bizarre beliefs, are suspicious and paranoid, and have inappropriate and constricted affect. They have few close friends and are socially awkward. A schizotypal is someone like your strange cousin Becky who is addicted to astrology, believes she is psychic, and is the oddball at social gatherings. Schizotypal Disorder does ring some bells vis-Ã -vis Obama. One way the diagnosis doesn't fit, however, is that schizotypals are generally harmless, odd ducks. Not so with Obama.
--Trauma: My gut tells me that Obama was seriously traumatized in childhood. His mother disregarded his basic needs, dragged him all over the place, and ultimately abandoned him. But I think there may be something even more insidious in his family background. While I can't prove it, the degree of Obama's disconnect reminds me of my sexually abused clients. With serious sexual abuse, the brain chemistry may change. The child dissociates -- that is, disconnects from his being -- in order to cope. Many adult survivors still dissociate, from occasional trances to the most extreme cases of multiple personality disorder. Apparently, young Barry was left in the care of Communist Frank Marshall Davis, who admitted to molesting a 13-year-old girl. As a teenager, Obama wrote a disturbing poem, "Pop," that evoked images of sexual abuse -- for instance, describing dual amber stains on both his and "Pop's" shorts. Would trauma explain Obama's disconnect? In many ways, yes. A damaged and unattached child may develop a "false self." To compensate for the enormous deficits in identity and attachment, the child invents his own personality. For Obama, it may have been as a special, gifted person.
Let's return now to my original question: What is wrong with Obama? My guess is a great deal. The answer is complex and likely includes some combination of the above.
Along with the brain issues are personality disorders: narcissism, paranoia, passive-aggressiveness. There's even the possibility of the most destructive character defect of all, an antisocial personality. Untreated abuse can foster antisocial traits, especially among boys.
If my assessment is accurate, what does this mean? It means that liberals need to wake up and spit out the Kool-Aid...and that conservatives should put aside differences, band together, and elect as many Republicans as possible.
Obama will not change. He will not learn from his mistakes. He will not grow and mature from on-the-job experience. In fact, over time, Obama will likely become a more ferocious version of who he is today.
Why? Because this is a damaged person. Obama's fate was sealed years ago growing up in his strange and poisonous family. Later on, his empty vessel was filled with the hateful bile of men like Rev. Wright and Bill Ayers. Obama will not evolve; he will not rise to the occasion; he will not become the man he was meant to be. This is for one reason and one reason alone: He is not capable of it.

10-07-02 Mangelnde Due Process Untergräbt Claims of Re-Einrichtung von öffentlichen Korruptions-Einheit der US-Justizminister Office, Los Angeles, Kalifornien.

Andre' Birotte, Jr
US Attorney, Los Angeles

Lack of Due Process Undermines Claims of Re-establishment of Public Corruption Unit at the US Attorney Office, Los Angeles, California.
Los Angeles, July 2 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, filed request with Andre' Birotte, US Attorney Office, Central District of California, for due process in acceptance, acknowledgement, and review of complaints in the recently re-established public corruption and civil rights unit. [1] On June 12, 2010, news was published that the public corruption and civil rights unit had been re-established by the newly appointed  Andre' Birotte, Jr - US Attorney, Central District of California. [2] The news report cited a memo by the US Attorney stating that "he hoped to have the unit operational by July 1. "
Following the news, Human Rights Alert (NGO) filed complaints with the re-established unit, alleging large-scale false imprisonments by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and the Los Angeles Superior Court, and real estate and financial institution fraud under the guise of litigations at the same court.  Consequently, Dr Zernik attempted to document the process established by the US Attorney Office for acceptance, acknowledgement, and review of complaints.  On all three measures, the process established by the US Attorney Office appeared deficient. For example - no contact information for the US Attorney Office, Central District of California, was found on its web site at all, in contrast with all web pages of other similar offices in the United States, which were examined, including, but not limited to all other US Attorney Offices in California. No acknowledgement and no ID numbers were issued on complaints filed with the office, and it was not clear that review of the complaints would result in a signed statement by an authorized person. Moreover, the re-established public corruption and civil rights unit was never mentioned on the US Attorney Office, Central District of California web site, not even in the organizational chart.
Widespread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles County, California, was the core of the April 2010 report filed by Human Rights Alert (NGO) with the United Nations for the first ever review of human rights in the United States by the United Nations, scheduled for November 2010.  The letter to US Attorney Briotte stated that there was no expectation that his office would fully address the widespread corruption in Los Angeles County in time for the review.  However, it was expected that due process would be immediately established in accepting, acknowledging, and reviewing complaints.  "Absent due process, the re-establishment of the Public Corruption and Civil Rights Unit may be seen as only a pretense," said Dr Zernik, "surely the unit cannot be considered operational at this time".
Human Rights Alert (NGO) copied its letter to Chairs of the US Congress Judiciary Committees, to the United Nations, and to the State Department.
Response by the US State Department to the United Nations on human rights in the United States is due by August 2010. LINKS
[1] July 1, 2010 request for due process at the US Attorney Office, Central District of California
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33802333/[2] June 12, 2010 Los Angeles Times news report of re-establishment of public corruption and civil rights unit at the US Attorney Office, Los Angeles
http://inproperinla.com/10-06-12-us-attorney-los-angeles-created-public-corruption-civil-rights-unit-la%20times.pdf

10-07-01 Beschwerde gegen Herrn Danny Bickell - US Supreme Court Counsel, rügt die öffentliche Korruption und Entrechtung //Complaint filed against Mr Danny Bickell - US Supreme Court Counsel, Alleging Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights

  
Washington DC, July 1 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, filed complaint with Ronald C Machen Jr, US Attorney for the District of Columbia, against Mr Danny Bickell, US Supreme Court Counsel, alleging public corruption and deprivation of rights under the color of law. [1]  The complaint pertained to conduct of Mr Bickell in March-April 2010 in relationship to the US Supreme Court application - Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) -  filed by the 70 year old, former US prosecutor Richard Fine, who is held in solitary confinement since March 2009 in Los Angeles, California.  The complaint alleged that on March 12, 2010 Mr Bickell issued a letter noticing denying of Mr Fine's application by Associate Justice Kennedy with no authority at all, and with no valid record in the US Supreme Court file to support the notice.  Later, on March 30, 2010, Richard Fine re-filed his application with the US Supreme Court. Consequently, Dr Zernik filed on April 20, 2010 a Motion to Intervene, where he documented Mr Bickell's conduct relative to the purported March 12, 2010 denial of Mr Fine's application.  Dr Zernik's Motion to Intervene, likewise, documented similar conduct at other courts. The complaint alleged that in April 2010 Mr Bickell eliminated Dr Zernik's Motion to Intervene from the records of the US Supreme Court both to cover up his own alleged wrongdoing in the same case in March 2010, and likewise - to cover up alleged wrongdoing of others in the lower courts. Combined, the complaint alleged that in March and April 2010 Mr Bickell engaged in deliberate efforts to obstruct justice and deprive Mr Fine of his rights for fair hearing and due process of law.
Mr Fine exposed, publicized, and rebuked the taking by Los Angeles judges of "not permitted" payments, which were described by media as "bribes".  The facts exposed by Mr Fine necessitated the signing on February 20, 2009 of "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all such judges.  Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009, Mr Fine was arrested in open court. Mr Fine has been held in solitary confinement ever since.  Dr Zernik's Motion to Intervene documented the issuance and publication in online dockets of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, the US District Court, Los Angeles, and the US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, of invalid, false and misleading records.  The Motion to Intervene alleged wrongdoing in all three courts relative the issuance by clerical or unauthorized court staff of such records and dockets, first - to affect the arrest of Mr Fine and his ongoing imprisonment with no judgment, conviction, or sentencing ever entered in his case, and later - to undermine his habeas corpus petition.
Human Rights Alert (NGO) also forwarded its complaint against Mr Bickell to the Chairs of US Congress Judiciary Committees, and urged them to initiate review of unvalidated and insecure case management systems of the US courts, which permitted conduct as documented in the complaint.  The complaint was also copied to the United Nations, as part of the 2010 - first ever - review by the United Nations of Human Rights in the United States.  Human Rights Alert's April 2010 report to the United Nations alleged that unvalidated and false case management systems at the US courts were employed for large-scale deprivation of rights. [2] In paper, filed by Dr Zernik for review by international computer science conference, large-scale fraud was alleged in PACER and CM/ECF - the public access and case management systems of the US courts. [3] The international computing community was urged to assume a leading role in protection of rights in the digital era.
LINKS:
[1] July 1, 2010 Complaint against Mr Danny Bickell, US Supereme Court Counsel
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/
[2] April 2010 report filed by Human Rights Alert with the United Nations
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
[3] Data Mining of the Networked US Courts 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33520631/