Why was this blog created?
All further in-house efforts to further justice in the US justice system are futile. These efforts are only worthwhile to the degree that they provide additional documentation of the widespread corruption of the US justice system.
Our focus must be on the international community.
In November 2010 the United Nations will review for the first time ever the Human Rights record of the United States. Corruption of the justice system was the core of reports filed by Human Rights Alert and others for the April 2010 deadline.
In August 2010 the US State Department is scheduled to respond on the reports, and in November 2010 the UN will conduct the review session and issue the report, and set goals, which the US would be asked to reach between 2010 and the next scheduled review in 2014.
Between now and November 2010, we must focus on informing and lobbying the nations that sit on the review panel, to ensure that the most effective report is issued.
This blog was created in hope that the German Federal Government would support a UN UPR report that calls upon the US federal government to provide equal protection under the law to all who reside in the United States.
Please call or write your elected representatives and ask that the German Government support in November 2010 the issuance of a UPR report by the United Nations, which calls upon the US government to abide by its duties and responsibilities pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – ratified international law.
Bitte rufen Sie an oder schreiben Sie Ihrem gewählten Vertreter. Fragen Sie, ob die deutsche Regierung im November 2010 die Ausstellung eines UPR Bericht der Vereinten Nationen unterstuetzt.
Bitte unterzeichnen Sie die Petition - Richard Fine zu Befreien
Richard Fine - 70 Jahre alt, ehemaliger US-Staatsanwalt, hatte gezeigt, dass die Richter in Los Angeles County "nicht zulässig" Zahlungen angenommen hatten (von den Medien "Bestechungsgelder" genannt). Am 20. Februar 2009 unterzeichnete der Gouverneur von Kalifornien "rückwirkende Immunität" (Verzeihung) für alle Richter in Los Angeles. Weniger als zwei Wochen später, am 4. März 2009, wurde Richard Fine in einer öffentlichen Sitzung verhaftet, ohne Gerichtlichen beschluss. Er ist seitdem in Einzelhaft in Los Angeles, Kalifornien; es ist weder ein Urteil noch eine Verurteilung ergangen.
Dienstag, 27. Juli 2010
10-07-27 Martha Minow, Dekan der Harvard Law School, für die Vertretung in Angeforderte Re: Verdacht auf Betrug in US Supreme Court Records
Dean, Harvard Law SchoolMartha Minow, Dean of Harvard Law School, Solicited for Representation in re: Alleged Fraud in US Supreme Court Records Los Angeles, July 27 - Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, solicited Martha Minow, Harvard Law School Dean, for representation in original action in the Supreme Court of the United States, pertaining to alleged fraud in US Supreme Court records and misprision by William Suter, Clerk of the Court. Human Rights Alert claimed fraud in notices issued by Court Counsel Danny Bickell pertaining to Applications in Fine v Baca (09-A827) and Taitz v MacDonald (10-A56), which claimed denial by Justices Kennedy and Thomas, respectively, and in the corresponding online dockets of the Court. The notices were claimed to be false on their faces and issued with no authority at all by Counsel Danny Bickell.  Moreover, notice in Fine v Baca was shown to have no foundation in records of the Court file.
Both cases pertained to penalties imposed on attorneys who represented clients in causes, which were not favored by government.
Former US prosecutor Richard Fine exposed, publicized, and rebuked the taking by judges in Los Angeles County of "not permitted" payments ("bribes"), which necessitated the signing of "retroactive immunities" ("pardons") for all such judges. He has been imprisoned in solitary confinement for the past 17 months in Los Angeles, California, with no warrant ever issued, and no judgment/ conviction/ sentencing ever entered.
Attorney Orly Taitz represented clients in cases questioning the native, born citizenship of President Barack Obama. Serious sanctions were imposed on her.
The alleged abuse represented intimidation of counsel who stood for the rights of the people, and collusion of the courts at all levels in creating false public perception that such conduct was reviewed by the courts and was found in compliance with the law.
The courts transitioned to internet based publication of records and dockets - albeit with no validation of such systems and with no Local Rules of Courts to govern such practices. The courts published unverified online records, which the courts themselves never deemed valid court records, but which media and the public at large falsely assumed were true and valid court records. In parallel, the courts restricted access to true court records.
The request forwarded to Dean Minow detailed such conduct relative to the imprisonment of Richard Fine:
1) The Los Angeles Superior Court - published a false online "Case Summary", but denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in the case management system of the court in the case.
2) The Sheriff of Los Angeles County - published false online arrest and booking records in its "Inmate Information Center", but denied access to the true Los Angeles County Booking Record of Inmate Richard Fine.
3) The US District Court, Los Angeles - published a false online "PACER docket", but denied access to the NEFs (Notices of Electronic Filing - the authentication records) in the case, and the paper record, which was Richard Fine's commencing record - the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was allegedly adulterated at the US District Court.
4) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - published a false online "PACER dockets", but denied access to the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity - the authentication records), and also to critical records filed by respondents in the appeal.
5) The US Supreme Court - published a false online "docket" noting March 12, 2010 denial by Justice Kennedy, which was not supported by the Court records in the case. Access to true court dockets of the Supreme Court's case management system was yet to be permitted.
Review of such conduct by the courts was sought by Human Rights Alert in the context of the pending review of Human Rights in the United States as part of the first ever UPR (universal periodic review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations scheduled for November 2010.
The April 2010 UPR report by Human Rights Alert, alleged large-scale fraud in online public access and case management systems of the courts in the United States. The report called for publicly and legally accountable validation of such systems.
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of online public access and case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.LINKS: http://www.scribd.com/doc/34940014
 http://www.scribd.com/doc/34835883/ http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/
Contact:Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (HRA), NGO
Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County, California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration of integrity of the justice system in the United States.
WHAT DID THE EXPERTS SAY ABOUT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA?* "Innocent people remain in prison"* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justice system that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the system, have not produced any response that we know of..."LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006) [i]
* "...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they did not commit." Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000) [ii]
* "This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states... and judges must share responsibility when innocent people are convicted." Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000) [iii]
[i] LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
[ii] Paper by Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2001)
[iii] Paper by Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2001)
April 19, 2010 Human Rights Alert submission for the 2010 UPR (Universal Periodic Review) of Human Rights in the United States by the United Nations:a) Press Release:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/d) UPR Tool Kit by the Urban Justice Center: